Expert Council
Many viewpoints collapsing into clarity.
Most AI chat is one voice giving you one perspective. Real decisions benefit from structured disagreement. When you're facing a hard choice — career move, architecture decision, strategy call — you don't want one opinion. You want a room full of smart people who see it differently, argue about it, and help you find what you actually think.
A Research Agent searches the web, then selects 2–4 relevant experts from a roster of 9 distinct personas (Stoic Philosopher, Decision Helper, Creative Thought Partner, Time Traveler Analyst, and more). The experts discuss the topic in real-time through WebSocket-powered chat. Three discussion modes: Cooperative (experts build on each other), Debate (experts argue and defend positions), and Devil's Advocate (experts challenge your thinking). Each expert can search the web mid-discussion, and users can see their extended thinking — the actual reasoning, not just polished output.
The experts aren't the same AI with different labels. A behavioral testing rubric with 36-case evaluations ensures a Stoic Philosopher and a Decision Helper actually give meaningfully different advice — not the same answer reworded. The system was built for thinking quality, not chat speed.
Languages
Frontend
Backend
AI
Search
Infrastructure
Beta — functional, not publicly launched